Sunday, January 31, 2021

Americans are paying too much, for too little

On 26 June 2008, in testimony before The President's Council on Bioethics, Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, a primary care physician, stated:



Now, it turns out that medical bankruptcy is, as I said, half of all personal bankruptcies. Millions of people each year are affected by medical bankruptcy, but 76 percent of people who were in medical bankruptcy in our study had health insurance at the onset of the illness that bankrupted them.


So insured people have an issue, too, if they have a prolonged, serious illness. They can't work. They have lots of co-payments, lots of deductibles. They can end up in bankruptcy, as well.

 


Dr. Steffie Woolhandler is also an Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard and co-director of the Harvard Medical School General Internal Medicine Fellowship program.  Her testimony was removed from the government website by the Trump Administration, but you can still view an archived copy on the Internet Wayback Machine.


Most Americans don't realize how badly flawed the medical system is in their own country and how many Americans go without adequate medical care as a result.  Even though the US spends more on health care, both per-capita and also as a percentage of its national GDP, than any other developed nation in the world.  According to the OECD, health-care spending in the US was 17.7% of US GDP in 2019 (source).  That's far more than any other country, nearly 50% more than was spent by the next highest country on their list. 


Americans spend nearly twice as much as the average developed (rich) country ... but they die 1.7 years earlier.  You find something wrong with that?  Every reasonable person does.




Total Health Spending / Government / Voluntary, US dollars per capita, 2019



With so much wealth spent on health care ... are Americans healthier than people in Switzerland, Germany, Canada?  In what way could that be measured? Perhaps by life expectancy? Infant mortality rates? Prevalence of obesity? Heart disease death rates?  


It's not that health care in the US is bad, actually, it is the best available anywhere.  The problem is that the system is so inefficient that Americans pay far more for their health care than is, apparently, necessary.


Nearly half the counties in the US don't have a single ob-gyn providing maternity care (source).   In a for-profit health care system, doctors go where the money is.  In the US, where healthcare is apportioned by ability to pay, some people get the best care in the world, and immediately.  Millions go without.  Many put off necessary health care they can't afford.  Many die in "waiting lines" for health care they will never get.


What Americans have been doing for generations doesn't seem to be working anymore.  Is there a better way?   A reasonable person has to wonder.



Resource:


U.S. Health Care from a Global Perspective, 2019: Higher Spending, Worse Outcomes?

January 30, 2020
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2020/jan/us-health-care-global-perspective-2019


Saturday, January 23, 2021

Five myths Americans have about the Canadian Health Care system

Fifteen years ago, I moved my family to Canada from the United States, at the rather advanced age of 48.  I came to this country with a number of misconceptions about Canada's single-payer system of universal health care, most of all, the false notion that hospitals are government institutions, and that medical providers are government employees.  It doesn't work that way in Canada.

Americans, particularly young Americans, are looking for a medical care system like the one Canada has. Obamacare is not that system. Obamacare was just a first step in the right direction.

During the heated debate over the Affordable Care Act or "Obamacare", I spent several hours reading about it trying to understand why it was met with such fierce resistance. My wife asked me for a quick synopsis of the plan and the controversy; I explained it to her as I understood it.


"What you just described," she said, "is not a 'health care' plan at all ...  you just described a national 'insurance' plan. You said nothing about health care."


I was floored, "Whoa ... in 5 minutes, she understood what had taken me hours to comprehend." 


Because she reduced it to its core elements; she wasn't distracted by the hype on one side, and the fear-mongering on the other.


Americans don't need an insurance plan like Obamacare.  America needs an extension of its own world-class (Medicare) health care plan for seniors, which is similar to Canada’s system, funded by taxes, where doctors and hospitals have a single customer for billing: the government.  Medical services are mostly by the private sector, but there is a single customer for billing purposes: the government.


It is very encouraging that so many post-Boomer Americans are no longer afraid of the word "socialism."  Because, in that, lies the best hope Americans have for a better future.


Here are the most five most common misconceptions I've found that Americans have about Canada’s system of universal single-payer health care:




Myth:  Medicare is a Canadian-wide federal government program.  Canada's Medicare system is not a federal program, and is not administered by the federal government; it is provincial, and service varies, coverage varies, taxes vary, between provinces.  In some provinces, people pay insurance premiums for Medicare; in New Brunswick it is free, but here we don't have prescription drug coverage under the age of 65 (I have employer-provided supplemental insurance coverage for medications).  The only thing the federal government has to do with Medicare is to set "guidelines" for the provinces to ensure that every Canadian resident has equal access to all "medically necessary" health care services.  Medical providers are required to abide by the Canada Health Act of 1984, which basically guarantees every Canadian resident equal access to all "medically necessary" health care services, without co-payments of any kind.  Incidentally, access to medical care is a right of all human beings under the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was written, incidentally, by a Canadian, John Peters Humphrey.


Myth:  Wait times for medically-necessary procedures are long in Canada.  I know there are horror stories, I've heard them too, but I'm not aware of anyone, personally, who has gone without badly-needed medical treatment ... elective surgery can have long waits.  If you have a need to see a  medical specialist, at least in New Brunswick, you go immediately in most cases. That's my personal experience, in this province.  As for waiting lines for health care ... how many Americans wait for the remainder of their natural lives for necessary medical procedures?  Far too many.  Quite literally, they die waiting.


Myth:  Government bureaucrats, not doctors, make medical decisions in Canada.  It is important that everyone understands that, in Canada, the only people who are allowed to make decisions about who gets care are physicians.  In the United States, by contract, HMOs and other private medical insurers do indeed make decisions about who gets what care (it's probably more appropriate to say "who gets denied the care they need).  In Canada, medical decisions are left entirely up to doctors, and there are no requirements for pre-authorization whatsoever.   If your family doctor says you need an MRI, you get an MRI.  In the U.S., if an insurance administrator or HMO rep says you are not getting an MRI, then you're not getting  one regardless of what your doctor thinks — unless, of course, you pay for it out of your own pocket.  I bet you there are far more Americans paying for necessary medical procedures out of their own pockets than there are Canadians who find it necessary to do that.


Myth:  The government "manages" patient care in Canada.  Another misconception among Americans is the government of Canada "manages" patient care.  That's a gross misunderstanding, but a common one.  The health care system in Canada is not run by the government; it is funded by the government; there is a huge difference.  Medical treatment is solely the responsibility of doctors, not the Medicare system and its administrators.   This is complete unlike Health Management Organizations (HMOs)  in the US, where, essentially, a corporation DOES make medical decisions.  In Canada, a doctor's relationship to his patient is a professional medical one only; and doctors bill the government for services rendered under Medicare.  The doctor isn't forced to deal with insurance claims or payment collections.  It's much better that way.  


Myth:  Doctors in Canada work for the federal government and draw civil servants' salaries.  Nearly all health care in Canada is provided by private providers and administered by private or non-profit organizations.  None of the four hospitals my family has used in Canada is directly administered by the government.





Monday, January 11, 2021

99 years ago: Insulin first used (here in Canada)

On 11 January 1922, insulin was first used to treat diabetes.  In Canada.

Insulin had been discovered by three doctors at the University of Toronto:  Sir Frederick G Banting, Charles H Best and J.J.R. Macleod.

At that time, children in comatose states (from diabetic ketoacidosis) were kept in large wards of 50 or more patients.  Their deaths were considered inevitable and their families gathered at their bedsides during their final hours.

With nothing to lose from administering their purified insulin extract, Banting, Best, and James Collip (the Canadian biochemist who had purified the extract) went from bed to bed, injecting the entire ward. 

Before the three doctors had reached the last dying child, the first few were awakening from their comas, and the ward resounded with joyful cries from their family members.

The discoverers of insulin were reluctant, at first, to patent their process for purified insulin, but when they learned that an American company (Eli Lilly) intended to hijack and monopolize the production of insulin, they obtained a patent in the name of the University of Toronto with one condition spelled out:

The patent will not be used for any other purpose than to prevent the taking out of a patent by other persons. 

When the details of the method of preparation are published, anyone will be free to prepare the extract, but no one can secure a profitable monopoly.

And that's a story more compellingly dramatic than any war story I've heard.